What Is the Funding Rate in Perpetual Futures — and What Does Holding Cost?
Why perpetuals pay funding at all, how to turn a small 8-hour rate into a real monthly cost on your margin, and when funding quietly decides a trade's outcome.
Why perpetuals pay funding at all
A perpetual future never expires, so nothing forces its price to converge with the spot market. Funding is the mechanism that does it instead: at fixed intervals — commonly every eight hours — one side of the market pays the other, longs paying shorts when the perp trades above spot and shorts paying longs when it trades below. The exchange is not charging you a fee; the other side of the market is, and which side you are on decides whether you pay or receive.
Small rate, real money
The advertised number looks harmless because it is quoted per interval. A 0.01% rate every eight hours is three payments a day — roughly 0.03% of position notional daily, about 0.9% a month, near 11% annualized. On a $10,000 position that is about $3 a day and $90 a month.
Leverage is what turns that from a rounding error into a position cost. The payment is charged on notional, but your capital is the margin: at 10x, that ~0.9% of notional per month is roughly 9% of your margin per month. In stretched markets funding has printed several times the 0.01% baseline for days at a time — and it settles out of the same margin that is holding your liquidation line away.
When funding decides the trade
For a position closed within hours, funding is noise. It becomes the decision on three kinds of trade:
- Multi-day holds at leverage — a week of elevated funding can cost more than the stop distance you were protecting.
- Range strategies with thin expected edge — an edge of 0.5% per trade does not survive 0.9% per month of holding cost.
- Crowded direction trades — heavily positive funding means the crowd is long and paying for the privilege; the cost itself is telling you how consensus the position is.
Put it in the plan, not the postmortem
The honest way to hold a perpetual is to price the hold before entry: expected days held × intervals per day × an assumed rate × notional, subtracted from the trade's expected value, and checked against the margin buffer. A scenario is not a forecast — the point is that a trade you would not take at an assumed funding cost is a trade whose thesis depends on the market staying cheap to hold.
Run the numbers yourself
Review a perpetual position with its holding costCommon questions
Where do I see what I have actually paid?
Every major venue itemizes funding transfers in the account statement, separate from trading fees. Reading a month of your own funding history is the fastest cure for treating it as free — the total is often larger than commission for swing positions.
Can I earn funding instead of paying it?
The receiving side exists — that is who your payments go to. But taking a position to collect funding is a directional trade with a yield attached: the rate can flip sign, and the position can lose far more than funding pays. Delta-neutral versions carry their own basis and execution risks. Nothing about receiving funding is passive income.
Is funding the same on every exchange?
No — the interval, the formula's clamp, and the realized rate all differ by venue and by contract. The only number that matters to your position is your venue's, on your contract, over your actual holding period.
Maximelion is decision support, not financial advice. It does not predict markets, recommend trades, or guarantee outcomes. All figures on this page are arithmetic examples, not recommendations.